- Structured risk assessment workflows with customizable scoring methodology
- Living risk register with owners, treatments, and review dates
- Treatment tracking from acceptance decision to remediation closure
- Framework-mapped outputs: SOC 2, ISO 27001 clause 6, HIPAA risk analysis
- Documented risk methodology applied consistently across assessments
- Risk treatment decisions with accountable owners and deadlines
- Periodic risk review cadence enforced with reminders
- Point-in-time risk assessment reports with methodology
- Risk register exports with treatment history
- Management review records tying risk to decisions
Jira · Linear · Slack
Every framework converges on the same demand: show us that you identify risks deliberately, decide their treatment consciously, and revisit them on a cadence. A spreadsheet risk register dies the week after the audit. A register with owners, deadlines, and enforced reviews stays alive — and becomes the artifact that makes every subsequent audit shorter.
HIPAA Compliance Services — HIPAA compliance services for healthtech and covered entities: security risk analysis, safeguards implementation, BAA management, and breach-ready procedures.
vCISO Services — Virtual CISO services for startups and scaleups: security strategy, compliance roadmap, enterprise deal support, and board reporting — without the $300K hire.
Is this enough for the HIPAA security risk analysis?
The module provides the structure, register, and documentation trail. For PHI environments we typically pair it with our HIPAA service, where practitioners conduct the analysis to OCR's expected depth — the combination is what withstands an investigation.
How do risk assessments differ across frameworks?
SOC 2 expects risk assessment as an entity-level control; ISO 27001 makes it the engine of the whole ISMS; HIPAA demands an ePHI-specific analysis. One register serves all three when the methodology and scoping are set correctly, which the module templates enforce.